Source labels
- Documented — supported by a cited order/filing/transcript excerpt (redacted)
- Allegation — claimed by a party; not established in the post
- Hypothesis — working theory
- Observation — first-hand procedural observation without a document
Community
Required structure for [CASE PATTERN] posts when moderated submissions open. Moderators return incomplete posts. Do not attach sealed or unredacted documents.
TITLE: [CASE PATTERN] [Jurisdiction tag] — one-line summary JURISDICTION: Country: State / Province: County / District: Court or Agency: MATTER TYPE: (Civil / Criminal / Family / Juvenile / Housing / Administrative / Other) CASE STATUS: [ ] Pre-filing [ ] Active trial-level [ ] Post-judgment [ ] Appeal [ ] Enforcement [ ] Closed/Resolved PUBLIC CASE ID: (optional public docket number, or "Anonymized") SPECIFIC PROBLEM (≤2 sentences): What precisely happened or is recurring? Avoid slogans. FACTS (chronological; no legal conclusions): - [Date] — [Event]. source=[Order|Filing|Transcript|Email|Observation|Other]; label=[Documented|Allegation|Hypothesis] QUESTIONS / REQUESTS: What help do you want? (procedure interpretation, research leads, pattern check) WHAT'S BEEN TRIED: - Action → result PROPOSED NEXT STEP (non-advice; your idea): Research project, template outline, policy question, education topic, etc. PATTERN QUERY: Has anyone seen this in another county/state/court? REDACTION ATTESTATION: [ ] I removed sealed content and personal identifiers for non-public parties.
Raw posts are community data. Promotion into any research extract requires moderator redaction review and separate consent flags. Content is never auto-synced to NORA One evidence stores.